Gordon Robertson’s supreme evil - hiding behind Jesus to cheerlead for genocide
Peterson supports his Zionism on the mental gymnastic that the victims are the perpetrators and the all-powerful army replete with US weapons are the victims.
He does this effortlessly by simply convincing himself and his brain-dead audience that the Nakba is just a tall tale spun by the Arabs and the Israeli state was founded without harming a hair on anyone’s head.
But the Nakba was – and is – very real. The 1948 history is described in historical detail in the documentary Al-Nakba, which can be viewed here, or in Ilan Pappé’s book The Ethnic Cleansing of Israel, available here as a free download.
But Robertson hides behind the lie that all information like this about the founding of Israel is an Arab hoax. That way, he can continue supporting the crime syndicate Israel without the truth seeping out. And of course, it helps to hide behind the name of Jesus to do all this evil.
Amarynth Flower
Prof. Jeffrey Sachs on Going Underground: Be patient with the US. WHAT?
I feel the same way when I hear video presentations by Jeffrey Sachs, whose niceness scares me. You can’t make nice with pure evil.
I don’t want to be nice to the US elites. I want to see them die a horrible death. Of their own making.
My view is that, yes, we should forgive, it’s the Christian thing to do. BUT if someone sticks a knife in your back, it is nothing but hypocrisy and phoniness to claim you forgive the offender while the knife is still embedded.
It is normal to wait until the knife is withdrawn and the assailant has asked for forgiveness before even considering forgiveness.
Not only that, but there are crimes that are unpardonable. Atrocities, for example. I could never forgive Hitler and his supporters (some of whom continue to support his ideas) because he committed atrocities that harmed others. If THEY want to forgive him, or if God wants to forgive him fine. Let them.
But I can’t forgive someone who has seriously harmed others with the support of the “world community,” and please don’t ask me to.
I will never forgive the Senators (the vast majority) who took bribes from AIPAC and now support the genocide in Palestine.
And much less will I ever forgive the Evangelicals who hide behind the name of Jesus to support this genocide. If God wants to forgive them, that is His business, but I will never forgive them. After all, vengeance is mine saith the Lord, and that being the case, forgiveness is also of the Lord.
The prime example, I think, is the leader of this pack of Zionist hyenas, Gordon Robertson, who has for years headed up the 700 Club and the “Christian” TV channel CBN, with its reports slanted toward Israel, endorsing Israeli atrocities from the sick standpoint that Israel somehow enjoys God’s blessings simply because it is the supposed recipient of land given to Abram and his descendants.
This is the same God that gave the Hebrews the commandment to love their neighbors as themselves and also the equally important commandment to love the foreigner living among them with the same kind of love as their fellow Hebrews.
Gordon Robertson constantly tramples these commandments, pretending that God does not care about the atrocities committed by the supposed descendants of Abram. Robertson and his perverted followers seems to think God no longer applies these commandments to the Jews or the Israelis – even though these commandments were written specifically for the benefit of the ancient Israelites. And yet there is no hint in the Old or New Testaments that the Jews or Israelis are exempted from these commandments.
Jesus Himself, behind whose name Gordon Robertson hides to work his supreme evil of endorsing atrocities against the Palestinians, constantly railed against the Jewish leaders of His time, even calling them a nest of vipers, and was ultimately murdered by these Jewish leaders.
Yet Gordon Robertson, like all “Christian” conservatives, thinks it is blasphemy to hold the ancient Jews responsible for Christ’s murder. These weak-minded people also think that to hold the Israelis responsible for their atrocity crimes is to violate the implied law contained in the Genesis passage “I will curse those who curse you [Abram and his seed] and bless them that bless you”. Yet there is not the slightest hint here that God exempts the Hebrews of responsibility for any crime they may commit!
In my view, the evil deeds of Adolph Hitler pale beside the supreme evil of Gordon Robertson, who not only whitewashes but in fact, endorses the atrocities of the Israelis and hides behind the name of Jesus to do this unparalleled evil.
Thus, as I see it, Gordon Robertson is the embodiment of the supreme evil, who cannot be forgiven because he, a powerful influencer, not only endorses the ultimate crime of genocide but hides it behind the name of Jesus, thus corrupting all of Christianity by wrapping it in the bloody envelope of “Christian” Zionism, which is no more nor less than a Satanic movement.
Now if you are a Christian who adheres to Christ’s actual teachings, do you suppose that Satanists like Gordon Robertson, who mislead millions of Evangelicals into a Satanic genocide-supporting doctrine, go to heaven when they die?
**
Here is your daily air strike update for June 17, 2024
“Russian Spring”: Russian Aerospace Forces hit the Ukrainian Armed Forces air base in Mirgorod with missiles
Author: Alena Zhilina
Photo: Russian Ministry of Defense
June 17, 2024, 15:06 — Power Block
Several information sources immediately reported about powerful missile strikes by the Russian Aerospace Forces on Mirgorod in the Poltava oblast. According to the military commanders of the Russkaya Vesna [Russian Spring], in Mirgorod there is an air base of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, where fuel storage facilities are located, as well as training centers for Ukrainian pilots. The scale of the consequences of missile attacks remains unknown at this time.
…
VD: The commander of the Armed Forces of Ukraine recorded an appeal to the Ukrainians with threats due to inaction
“It is reported that a certain object has been hit, there are people under the rubble. The power has gone out in some parts of the city,” the military correspondents reported.
It is also known that on June 17, not far from the Ukrainian border in the Czech Republic, a powerful explosion occurred at a military training ground. According to official sources of the Czech Armed Forces, as a result of the detonation, a fire broke out at the facility, which was extinguished over several hours. Russian military officers informed that at this training ground, Ukrainian military personnel are trained by foreign specialists from the NATO bloc, who prepare them for combat operations in the special operation zone. The reasons why the explosion occurred have not been disclosed. [This is being reported in the West simply as an ammo explosion in the Czech base.]
Earlier, “Silavoy Blok” reported that Russian troops released a 1,500 kg aerial bomb on a Ukrainian Armed Forces UAV crew near Kherson.
**
Translation with my notes in bold and in [brackets]
EADaily
Don't want peace? Then Russia will have new regions, but you will not be there in a year
June 17, 2024
The enemy rejected Vladimir Putin’s peace plan for Ukraine, which will lead in mid-2025 to the West’s total loss in the war with Russia. Pravda.Ru columnist Lyubov Stepushova writes about this. [Past experience proves that sending western weapons and ammo to Ukraine does not improve Ukraine’s strategic fortunes.]
Russian President Vladimir Putin publicly announced Russia's peace plan for Ukraine for the first time at a meeting with senior staff of the Russian Foreign Ministry. The main points of the plan: the complete withdrawal of the Armed Forces of Ukraine from the DPR, LPR, Zaporozhye and Kherson regions; neutral, non-aligned, nuclear-free status of Ukraine, its demilitarization and denazification; ensured rights, freedoms and interests of Russian-speaking citizens in Ukraine; recognition of new territories of the Russian Federation - the status of Crimea, Sevastopol, Donetsk, Lugansk people's republics, Kherson and Zaporozhye regions as subjects of the Russian Federation; the lifting of all Western sanctions against Russia.
[You can see that this raises the bar higher than the West is ready to accept. I think Putin knew this and that they would not accept this plan. But they will be forced to accept it after the war has proceeded a bit further, and then Russia can say: we gave you a peace offer and you rejected it, causing unnecessary losses on the battlefield]
Putin emphasized that there will be no truce, as the West wants, in order to restore losses, rearm the Kiev regime, and prepare it for a new offensive. We are not talking about freezing the conflict, but about its final completion. After the implementation of the above agreements, documented on the Ukrainian side by the Verkhovna Rada [upper house of parliament], we can begin to create “an indivisible Eurasian security system that takes into account the interests of all states without exception.”
“Today we are making another concrete, real peace proposal. If in Kyiv and in the Western capitals they refuse it, as before, then, in the end, that is their business. Their political and moral responsibility for the continuation of bloodshed,” the president pointed out.
He warned that the realities on the line of combat contact will continue to change not in favor of the Kyiv regime. And the conditions for the start of the next negotiations from the Russian Federation will be different.
The answer came from NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. He said Putin's proposal meant that Russia must achieve its military goals and Ukraine "must give up much more land than was captured by Russia." He called the Kremlin’s proposal a proposal “for greater aggressiveness.” According to him, it demonstrates that Russia's goal is to control Ukraine. The Secretary General assured that NATO allies will continue to support Ukraine and provide it with weapons. [What the West fails to understand is that Russia already controls Ukraine. It controls the narrative, negating all the Western lies. Nothing the West has done has improved the Ukrainian outlook in a real strategic way]
Pentagon chief Lloyd Austin believes that Putin “has no right” to impose peace conditions on Ukraine, and the United States and its allies need to step up efforts to supply weapons to Kyiv, since the Ukrainian conflict has entered a “key stage.” Reuters reports that Vladimir Zelensky called Putin’s peace proposals for Ukraine an “ultimatum.” [FOOLS. Suppying weapons is all the West knows how to do and it invariably fails]
The enemy’s reaction is clear, so in the near future the Kharkov region will become part of the Russian Federation (but the Russian Federation could leave the Kharkov region), then Sumy, etc.
There is a war of attrition, and the Ukrainian economy is on the verge of collapse. The Kiev regime is unable to ensure the country's energy security [because Russian missiles and drones keep destroying power utilities and can continue to do so at will], and society is against mobilization. The turning point, as Putin previously suggested, will occur in 2025, when 18-year-olds will be conscripted in Ukraine and “Zelensky will be removed.” By that time, despair will already reign in Ukrainian society because of the “black winter”, which many will not survive. Therefore, the arrival of Russia will be perceived as salvation. [Many Ukrainians already want Russia to win. This explains the fact that, even in non Russian speaking regions, there is no lack of underground facilitators willing to supply military info to Russia, such as the coordinates of buildings housing Ukrainian troops, officers and foreign mercenaries, enabling the Russian forces to strike them from the air]
The top Nazis are awaiting a tribunal.
Putin’s peace plan is a “knight’s move” before the conference in Switzerland, showing its futility. The sooner the “peace party” comes to power in Ukraine and the United States, the better it would be for the “Svidomy” [a Ukrainian word used to describe Ukrainians. It literally means “knowine ones”] and their masters, but they don’t understand this yet. In a few years, they will regret that they did not agree to Putin’s proposal.
**
https://orientalreview.su/2024/06/17/international-relations-need-reforms/
International Relations Need Reforms
Written by Hunter MAXWELL on 17/06/2024
ICC-US-Hypocrisy
The US vs The ICC: Hypocrisy At Its Finest
30/05/2024
US-Intlernational -Criminal-Court-threats
Forces Of Impunity: The US Threatens The International Criminal Court
07/05/2024
Ukraine-Russia-NATO-defeat
NATO’s Soon-Impending Surrender To Russia In The Battlefields Of Ukraine
06/05/2024
The-world-needs-a-new-multipolar-system-of-international-relations.
It’s no secret that we live in a time of incredible political turbulence. Events are moving so fast and international processes must adapt to them. However, the current system of international relations, based on the centuries-old dominance of the West, although it has begun to reform, is still not active enough. As a result, there are international institutions and organizations in the world today, and relationships between countries have been built that either fully or partially do not meet the interests of a large number of countries.
The global problem of transatlantic structures is that they are absolutely sure they are right. Politicians did not even consider in theory the possibility that their approach in international relations with imposing their own position on any country in the world might be wrong. However, it was just like that. Russia has repeatedly offered a way out of this situation. Similar initiatives include the proposal to conclude a European security treaty in 2008, and in a memorandum by the Russian Foreign Affairs Ministry, which was handed over to the West in December 2021. But these attempts, unfortunately, were not successful. At best, issues that did not play a decisive role in bilateral relations were proposed for discussion, but were of a secondary nature and were beneficial only to Europe and the United States.
However, the approach of the United States and Europe discredited itself very quickly. Is it worth remembering all the countries that have suffered as a result of the actions of Washington and its allies? Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Afghanistan are the most affected states at the hands of the West. But everyone understands the outcome of the actions taken: millions of broken lives, thousands, tens of thousands of dead. Today, NATO continues the White House‘s policy in the Middle East and North Africa, regions in which NATO‘s presence was never intended at all. NATO‘s presence in Ukraine is developing, and today the North Atlantic Alliance is almost openly participating in military operations in the east of the country.
Vladimir Putin offered the West a way out of the current situation. In his speech at the Russia’s Foreign Ministry, he outlined the foundations of the future security architecture, which will be laid jointly by Russia and China with the participation of other Eurasian states. Its key point is that participation in the new structure will be open to all countries based on geographical location: “We live on the same continent, no matter what happens, geography cannot be changed, we will have to coexist and work together one way or another.” However, the participating countries will be guided by the principles of equality and mutual respect.
The biggest danger in Europe comes from the politicians themselves, who, at least, create a feeling, that they fear Washington more than the discontent of their own citizens. The European bureaucrats are ready to endure any humiliation from the United States, and at the same time declare that they are fulfilling the will of the peoples of Europe. Today, Washington is forcing Europe to increase arms supplies to Ukraine, and tomorrow it will require sending a military contingent? Will EU politicians agree to such demands? Given the fact that European countries are heavily dependent on their overseas partner today, it is quite possible for European leaders to agree to such a step.
https://orientalreview.su/2024/06/17/international-relations-need-reforms/
**
I’m sick of being forced to support Nazis and being told they’re normal and share our values
I keep saying it is hard – read impossible – for the West to enthusiastically support Neonazi leaders in Ukraine without being Nazis themselves. I also keep reminding that one of the hallmarks of Nazism is an irrational hatred and fear of Russia – the kind of Russophobia that is abundantly evident in the US State Department, Defense Department, and the attitude of US lawmakers and presidents toward the Ukraine war.
One thing is certain: Americans no longer trust their government, realizing that it lies to them constantly. It supports fascist genocide wholeheartedly while pretending to want Israel to obey international law. It enthusiastically supports a Neonazi-leaning Ukraine with arms and money while claiming the Ukronazis are not Nazis.
It is 100% Russophobic, even stealing Russian assets that were purchased from the US and left in US custody. It also steals Syrian oil and grain, as admitted by former president Trump, so what would we expect?
Here is substantiation of that in Italy’s far right ruling party:
A member of the youth wing of Brothers of Italy makes a fascist salute while being secretly filmed - Fanpage/Fanpage
© Provided by The Telegraph
Members of the Italian government’s youth wing have been caught making Nazi salutes in an undercover investigation into fascist leanings.
They were also seen chanting “Sieg Heil” and “Duce” in support of the fascist dictator Benito Mussolini, according to a report by the news site, fanpage.it.
Prime minister Giorgia Meloni’s Brothers of Italy party leads a coalition that is the country’s most Right-wing government since the Second World War.
She has attempted to position the party as the respectable face of the Right and claimed it had “consigned fascism to history” before taking power.
However at the weekend an investigation into the activities of the Gioventu Nazionale, or National Youth, of Ms Meloni’s party appeared to challenge that view.
**
Hamas wins one. Knocks out a Namer troop carrier, kills Israeli terrorists inside
**
May I just point out that disabling an aircraft carrier is not very difficult, as compared to sinking one. All you need to do is fire ballistic missiles into perhaps 2 key points in the flight deck, preventing planes from taking off or landing. Once that is accomplished, the carrier is only a big floating aircraft parking lot.
Saturday, June 15, 2024 12:37
Associated Press: The Houthis are about to launch unstoppable attacks
From aboard the destroyer USS Lapon in the Red Sea, the American Associated Press sheds light on the facts of what is happening in that region in light of the Yemeni armed forces continuing to carry out their attacks. It says in a report translated by the Trench website that "the US-led campaign against the Houthi rebels has turned into the most violent naval battle the Navy has faced since World War II." It quotes the destroyer's commanders as saying, "Sometimes, its sailors have seconds to confirm the Houthi launch, consult with other ships, and open fire on a barrage of incoming missiles that can approach or exceed the speed of sound." Emphasizing that "the Houthis are on the verge of launching the types of attacks that the United States cannot stop every time, and then we will start to see severe damage. ... If you let it fester, the Houthis will become a more capable, efficient, and experienced force."
Translated text [translated from English to Arabic, but then back to English by this site]:
ABOARD THE USS LAPON IN THE RED SEA (AP) — For decades, the U.S. Navy prepared to fight the Soviet Union, and later Russia and China, on the world's waterways. But instead of being a global power, the Navy finds itself locked in battle with a mysterious rebel group based in Yemen.
The U.S.-led campaign against Houthi rebels, overshadowed by the war between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip, has turned into the deadliest naval battle the Navy has faced since World War II, its commanders and experts told The Associated Press.
The fight pits the Navy's mission of keeping international waterways open against a group whose former arsenal of assault rifles and pickup trucks has grown into a seemingly inexhaustible supply of drones, missiles and other weapons. Almost daily attacks launched by the Houthis since November have clearly targeted more than 50 ships, while the volume of shipping has decreased in the vital Red Sea corridor that leads to the Suez Canal and to the Mediterranean Sea.
The Houthis say the attacks aim to stop the war in Gaza and support the Palestinians, although they come at a time when they are trying to strengthen their position in Yemen. All signs indicate that the war will intensify - putting American and allied sailors and merchant ships in greater danger.
“I don't think people really understand the seriousness of what we're doing and how ships are still under threat,” Commander Eric Bloomberg of the USS Labone told The Associated Press on a visit to his warship in the Red Sea. He said: "We only have to make a mistake once. The Houthis only have to capitalize on this mistake."
Seconds to act
The pace of the fire could be seen on the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, where the plating around the hatches of the missile pods was burned away from repeated launches. Sometimes, its sailors have seconds to confirm a Houthi launch, consult with other ships, and open fire on an incoming barrage of missiles that can approach or exceed the speed of sound.
“It's every day, every hour, and some of our ships have been here for more than seven months doing this,” said Capt. David Rowe, the commodore supervising the guided-missile destroyers.
One round of firing on January 9 saw Lapon aircraft, other ships, and F/A-18 aircraft from the aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower shoot down 18 drones, two anti-ship cruise missiles, and a ballistic missile fired by the Houthis.
Almost every day — apart from a slowdown during the holy month of Ramadan — the Houthis launch missiles, drones or some other type of attack in the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden and the narrow Bab al-Mandab Strait that connects waterways and separates Africa from the Arabian Peninsula.
The Navy saw periods of combat during the "Carrier Wars" of the 1980s in the Persian Gulf, but that largely involved ships striking mines. Houthi attacks include direct attacks on commercial ships and warships.
“This is the most sustained combat the U.S. Navy has seen since World War II, without a doubt,” said Brian Clark, a former Navy submariner and senior fellow at the Hudson Institute. “We're kind of on the cusp of the Houthis being able to launch the kinds of attacks that the United States can't stop every time, and then we'll start to see significant damage. ... If you let it fester, the Houthis will become a more capable, more efficient, more experienced force.”
Hazards at sea and in the air
While the Eisenhower appears to stay at a considerable distance, destroyers like the Lapon spend six out of seven days near or outside Yemen — the “weapons engagement zone,” in Navy speak.
Naval combat in the Middle East remains risky, something the Navy knows all too well. In 1987, an Iraqi fighter plane fired missiles that hit the USS Stark, a frigate patrolling the Persian Gulf during the Iran-Iraq War, killing 37 sailors and nearly sinking the ship.
There is also the US destroyer Cole, which was targeted by al-Qaeda suicide bombers in 2000 during a refueling stop in the Yemeni port city of Aden, killing 17 people on board. Associated Press journalists saw the destroyer Cole patrolling the Red Sea with Lapon on Wednesday, the same day the Houthis launched a drone attack on a commercial ship there that disabled the ship.
That merchant ship was abandoned on Friday and left adrift and unlit in the Red Sea, the British Army's UK Maritime Trade Operations Center said.
[It never ceases to amaze me that msm journalists are able to ignore the fact that the US-led West is in the ME to support genocide, while the “enemy” is the side that opposes genocide. Don’t they see the irony of all this? How can they see the West as the “good guys” any more?]
Admiral Mark Miguez, commander of the Navy's second carrier strike group, which includes the Eisenhower and the ships, said: That merchant ship was abandoned on Friday and left adrift and unlit in the Red Sea, the British Army's UK Maritime Trade Operations Center said.
Admiral Mark Miguez, the Navy commander of the second carrier strike group, which includes the Eisenhower and supporting ships, said that the Navy took out a drone carrying underwater bombs that the Houthis also launched during the campaign.
“We currently have very high confidence that Iran is not only providing financial support, but it is providing intelligence support,” Miguez said. “We know for a fact that the Houthis have also received training to target maritime shipping and to target American warships.”
In response to a question about whether the Navy believes that Iran is selecting targets for the Houthis, Miguez said only that there is “cooperation” between Tehran and the rebels. He also pointed out that Iran continues to arm the Houthis, despite UN sanctions that prevent the transfer of weapons to them. [But for God’s sake – it is ok to supply bombs to Israel to bomb innocent Palestinians??]
Iran's mission to the United Nations told the Associated Press that Tehran "is adept at thwarting the American strategy in a way that not only strengthens (the Houthis) but also ensures compliance with relevant resolutions."
The danger is not only on the water. The US-led campaign has carried out numerous airstrikes targeting Houthi positions inside Yemen, including what the US military describes as radar stations, launch sites, arsenals, and other sites. One round of US and British strikes on May 30 killed at least 16 people, the deadliest attack acknowledged by the rebels.
Eisenhower's aircrews dropped more than 350 bombs and fired 50 missiles on targets in the campaign, said Capt. Marvin Scott, who supervised all of the air group's planes. Meanwhile, the Houthis appear to have shot down several MQ-9 Reaper drones with surface-to-air missile systems.
“The Houthis also have ground-to-air capabilities that have deteriorated significantly, but they are still there and the Houthis are still there,” Scott said. We are always prepared to be shot by the Houthis."
A stopped war
Officers admit to some grumbling among their staff, wondering why the Navy isn't striking harder against the Houthis. The White House has not discussed the Houthi campaign at the same level as negotiations over the war between Israel and Hamas.
There are several possible causes. The United States is indirectly trying to reduce tensions with Iran, especially after Tehran launched a massive drone and missile attack on Israel and enriched uranium now closer than ever to weapons-grade levels.
Meanwhile, there are the Houthis themselves. The rebel group has brought the Saudi-led coalition to a stalemate in a broader war that has killed more than 150,000 people, including civilians, and caused one of the world's worst humanitarian disasters.
Directly fighting the Houthis is something the group's leaders likely want. Their slogan has long been "God is Great. Death to America. Death to Israel. Curse the Jews. Victory to Islam." Fighting against the United States and openly siding with the Palestinians has some in the Middle East praising the rebels.
While the United States and European partners patrol the waterways, Saudi Arabia has remained largely quiet, seeking a peace deal with the Houthis. Reports indicate that some Middle Eastern countries have asked the United States not to launch attacks on the Houthis from their territory, making Eisenhower's presence even more important. The aircraft carrier's deployment has been extended, while its crew has only had one port visit since its deployment a week after the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel.
Meanwhile, Houthi attacks continue to discourage shipping through the region. Egypt's revenues from the Suez Canal, a major source of hard currency for its faltering economy, have halved since the attacks began. Associated Press journalists saw a single commercial ship moving through the once-crowded waterway. “It's almost a ghost town,” Bloomberg admitted.
Source: Associated Press
Related tags
Red Sea United States Yemen Israel Gaza trenches
Countries and regions
Yemen