Mentally ill Mike Pompeo merrily dances with genocidal Israelis
Mike is a Neocon, a group that ought to be banned, because they are leading the world to the brink of nuclear war. Mike is also a “Christian” Zionist, who carries a Bible with him to public events.
He is a true believer in the crime syndicate we call “Israel.”
(Your daily air strike update for Feb 27, 2024, appears just after this article)
We shouldn’t be surprised that Mike celebrates Israeli genocide. After all, he was appointed by none other than Donald Trump, who thinks starving little children is funny.
Trump has fooled a lot of people into believing he will restore Christianity in America. But no, he will only continue the heresy of presenting Christ’s teachings as an Israel-centered fiendish political ideology that provides cover for wars and genocide. And that is the central theme of American Evangelicalism, a doctrine that puts country ahead of God and runs interference for the Pentagon. Clearly, this is not biblical Christianity, even though this unsavory blend of religion and false patriotism has been around for decades and has been paraded as conservative Christianity. It drove every war after WW II, and that’s what’s wrong with America, where we literally worship war.
You can’t credibly oppose abortion if you condone genocide.
Mike picked a bad time to openly support the genocidal Israel.
Up until Oct7, 2023, Israel’s crimes were well hidden by the US censors in our government, but the Neocons made a big mistake: They believed that censoring Israeli crimes in the msm was enough to keep us in the dark.
They forgot about social media. And just about when the world was waking up to the ghoul that was Israel, the msm started to become more truthful, realizing that their game was exposed.
And now we have a perfect storm for Israel, and for US politicians like Mike Pompeo.
https://twitter.com/mullisvsmachine/status/1757606947174359150?s=46&t=8wimbNkU3EmK72yEvf0GVA
Post
See new posts
Conversation
Ryan Mullis
@MullisVsMachine
Former U.S. Secretary of State & CIA Director Mike Pompeo presents a disgusting display at one of the worst possible times imaginable.
As Israel conducts the final phase of its ethnic cleansing, Mike Pompeo can be seen here dancing and celebrating what is undoubtedly a tragic and heartbreaking time for any sane person.
Dancing with soldiers of a Government currently engaged in Genocide while they pump our tax dollars into this failed project. This project which was born of the most perversely depraved mindset imaginable. Born of the idea that people are not intrinsically valuable, but that they are merely an obstacle to be removed, no matter how many lies you must tell to justify it.
References
US foreign policy is Zionism upscaled
https://donhank.substack.com/p/us-foreign-policy-is-zionism-upscaled
“Christian” Zionism
(18) "Christian" Zionism - by Don Hank - Don’s Substack
Gimme that old time Judeo-Christianity
https://donhank.substack.com/p/gimme-that-old-time-judeo-christianity
**
Translation with my notes in bold and in [brackets]
A massive blow to Ukraine was carried out on the night of February 27: explosions were heard in different cities
02/27/2024 | 05:46453
A massive strike on Ukraine was carried out on the night of February 27: explosions were heard in different cities. Missile strikes and the use of highly effective attack drones significantly reduce the combat potential of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU). Russian troops are carrying out targeted strikes on rear areas. On the night of February 27, explosions occurred in different Ukrainian oblasts.
A series of explosions occurred in the Khmelnitsky oblast of Ukraine. This was reported by the local publication Strana.ua, which is referenced by the 360 TV channel.
“There are reports of explosions in the Khmelnitsky oblast,” the publication informed.
At the same time, last night, information appeared about an explosion that occurred in the city of Krivoy Rog, located in the Dnepropetrovsk oblast of Ukraine.
In addition, according to Kharkov residents, explosions were heard in the city on Tuesday night. According to preliminary data, military installations in the city were attacked by attack drones.
A series of explosions occurred in the city of Poltava. This happened against the backdrop of an air raid warning in the oblast, reports the Ukrainian publication Obshchestvennoe, to which Svobodnaya Pressa [Russian] refers.
Before this, explosions occurred in the center of Ukrainian-controlled Kherson, as stated by the head of the city administration, Roman Mrochko. He urged local residents not to be outdoors.
At the same time, according to the official resource for alerting the population, the alarm is also howling in the Dnepropetrovsk, Kirovograd, Nikolaev, Sumy, Kharkov and Cherkassy oblasts of the country. In addition, it was included in the Kyiv-controlled areas of the DPR, Zaporozhye and Kherson oblasts.
**
NYT admits Putin’s incursion in Ukraine was PROVOKED as I wrote back in April 2022
What I wrote here on April 1, 2022, showed that the Russian invasion on Feb 24, 2022 was provoked after all, and the NYT now admits the invasion was NOT unprovoked as asserted by all msm thus far! (The NYT apparently did not use the same evidence as I did but the assertion of “unprovoked” can no longer be considered legitimate.
Now, it is time to indict those warmongering news outlets, journalists and politicians who falsely declared that “Putin’s invasion was unprovoked.”
Theoretically, they could all be indicted under Article 20 of a UN GA covenant of 1966, which states
1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.
2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
https://twitter.com/WarClandestine/status/1762212104155595135
Details here:
https://responsiblestatecraft.org/cia-ukraine-russia/
CIA in Ukraine: Why is this not seen as provocation?
An explosive new NYT report shows how Washington needlessly fed into Russia’s worst fears and precipitated the invasion, justified or not
MARK EPISKOPOS
FEB 27, 2024
The White House’s messaging on the Ukraine war is built around two simple-yet-powerful adjectives: “We are united in our condemnation,” said President Joe Biden almost two years ago in a joint statement with EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, “of Russia’s unjustified and unprovoked war of aggression against Ukraine.”
The “unjustified and unprovoked” line has been used numerous times by a chorus of top U.S. officials and allies, quickly becoming a rhetorical mainstay of Biden’s maximum pressure campaign against the Kremlin.
This messaging conflates two important, yet fundamentally different issues. There is little question that Russia’s invasion has wrought a horrific human toll on Ukraine and upended European security in ways that few anticipated prior to February 2022. But it is also not without its context, which includes a litany of grievances that — however unjustified from the perspective of the West — constitute what the Kremlin saw as sufficient provocation to initiate the most destructive war in Europe in 1945.
An explosive New York Times exposé by Adam Entous and Michael Schwirtz sheds light on major developments preceding the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. According to the report, the Ukrainian government entered into a wide-ranging partnership with the CIA against Russia. This cooperation, which involved the establishment of as many as 12 secret CIA “forward operating bases” along Ukraine’s border with Russia, began not with Russia’s 2022 invasion, but just over 10 years ago.
Within days of the February 2014 Euromaidan Revolution that culminated with the ouster of President Viktor Yanukovych and ushered in a firmly pro-Western government, the newly appointed head of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), Valentyn Nalyvaichenko, reportedly proposed a “three-way partnership” with the CIA and MI6, the UK’s foreign intelligence service. Ukrainian security officials gradually proved their value to the U.S. by feeding the CIA intelligence on Russia, including “secret documents about the Russian Navy,” leading to the establishment of CIA bases in Ukraine to coordinate activities against Russia and various training programs for Ukrainian commandos and other elite units.
A graduate of one such CIA training program, then-Lt. Col. Kyrylo Budanov, went on to become the chief of Ukrainian military intelligence.
Kyiv routinely pushed this relationship’s boundaries, violating the Obama administration’s red lines around lethal operations by carrying out assassinations of high-profile Russian fighters on territory controlled by Russian-aligned separatists. The Kyiv-CIA partnership deepened under the Trump administration, yet again putting the lie to the baseless idea that former President Trump was somehow amenable to Russia’s interests while in office.
As Budanov reportedly put it, “It only strengthened. It grew systematically. The cooperation expanded to additional spheres and became more large-scale.” This cooperation, as painstakingly outlined by the Times, went far beyond helping Ukraine defend itself against Russia in a narrow, technical sense — rather, Ukraine was drawn into a Western coalition for the purpose of waging a broad-based shadow war against Russia.
The New York Times’ exposé offers no shortage of disturbing implications. Ukraine is, needless to say, a sovereign state in charge of determining its own security arrangements. The underlying issue is not whether Ukraine is within its rights to enter into this kind of relationship with the CIA, as it obviously is, nor is it whether the Maidan Revolution put Ukraine on a certain path toward political cooperation with Western entities.
The problem, rather, is one of basic security perceptions. Moscow repeatedly warned — for many years before 2014 — that it was and remains prepared to take drastic action to prevent Ukraine from being used by the West as a forward operating base against Russia. Yet that, as recounted in lurid detail by The New York Times, is precisely what has happened over the past 10 years.
The fact that Ukraine has not just willingly but enthusiastically submitted to this arrangement is immaterial to Russia’s core concerns. Nor can this issue be entirely reduced to NATO membership: Ukraine can play the role of an anti-Russian outpost on NATO’s eastern flank without ever formally joining the alliance, and this, too, is unacceptable to the Kremlin.
Justification is by nature a subjective exercise, but there can be little question that the activities described in this exposé constitute, from the Kremlin’s perspective, a dire provocation and would be seen as such by the United States if the situation were reversed and a rival superpower established such bases in Mexico. This perception is an inseparable part of the military and political context that shaped this war’s outbreak. It can be dismissed as paranoid, but if so it is a paranoia common to all security establishments.
It is unclear what concrete U.S. interests these joint intelligence activities served. They certainly did not facilitate de-escalation between Moscow and Kyiv or promote regional stability, goals ostensibly shared by the Obama and Trump administrations. On the other hand, it is quite easy to see how Kyiv’s deepening relationship with the CIA needlessly fed into Moscow’s worst security fears and precipitated its conclusion — whether justified or not — that it must act decisively in the face of an implacable conflict with the West over Ukraine.
**
The flat-out refusal of the GOP to honestly condemn the Israeli crimes may be the death knell of the Republican Party.
Senate Dem Chris Van Hollen calls out Israeli “war crime”
Senate Democrat Chris Van Hollen from Maryland called the “deliberate withholding of food” in Gaza a “textbook war crime” during a Senate floor speech on Monday, while urging President Biden to “take action” in response to the humanitarian crisis.
https://www.instagram.com/cbsnews/reel/C3TBfxDLk_t/
**
The news site Breaking Defense is a mouthpiece for the arms industry. Here is its latest ad for genocide.
https://breakingdefense.com/tag/indo-pacific/
Israel’s Elbit to supply systems for Australia’s Redback Infantry Fighting Vehicles
The $600 million contract calls for "advanced protection, fighting capabilities and a sensors suit."
By SETH J. FRANTZMAN
on February 26, 2024 at 5:32 PM
…
UK office of Israel’s largest arms manufacturer targeted by activists
(They’re talking about genocidal Israeli co. Elbit)
**
Our thanks to RH for this (in response to my article on Trump thinking genocide is funny):
Hosea 9:1 ¶Rejoice not, O Israel, for joy, as other people: for thou hast gone a whoring from thy God,
**
LaRouche’s Oasis Plan
Peace through development. The BRICS agrees
https://laroucheorganization.com/article/2024/02/10/oasis-plan-larouches-solution-middle-east
**
LaRouche Organization alternative to establishment lunacy
https://laroucheorganization.com/article/2024/02/26/larouche-alternative-establishment-lunacy
**
Lots of news the msm don’t want you to know
https://redacted.inc/newsletter/war-games-february-27-2024/
**
Translation with my notes in bold and in [brackets]
https://ria.ru/20240227/makron-1929757064.html
Macron decided to go to war with Russia after all
French President Emmanuel Macron during a press conference following a meeting to support Ukraine in Paris - RIA Novosti, 1920, 02/27/2024
Elena Karaeva
“Russia’s defeat is a necessary condition for European security and stability,” the French leader said yesterday in Paris, which, undoubtedly, cannot help but understand that his words, no matter how elaborate and threatening they may seem, are essentially nothing but hot air.
As these phrases were uttered, Macron’s comrade Olaf Scholz, a neighbor in geography and a teammate in the desire to “win” our country, definitely saw not pictures of European triumph over Russia, but shivering-from-cold, half-dead from fear, once brilliant, brand-new outfitted Wehrmacht soldiers and officers. And their European allies. In rags, barefoot, with that expression on his face that the Red Army soldiers looked at with disgust.
Macron spoke about how the pan-European bloc will defeat us on the battlefield, in the capital of France, where the cream of current political Russophobia has gathered, whose goal, with slight variation in nuances, is in the 19th century, in the 20th century and today, in the century XXI - restriction of Russia's political and economic influence up to its complete isolation. And destruction.
Previously, they collected money in billions of euros and dollars, and millions of artillery shells and bombs, and they trained security officers in the tens of thousands. Now this coalition, the ninth in a row, intends to find opportunities to supply long-range missiles and those same bombs. The next point of the program, though not entirely agreed upon, is the sending of NATO military personnel directly to the front line, to the Northern Military District zone.
If on the first position - sending long-range weapons - a European consensus has developed, if you trust Macron’s words, then as for sending manpower to places where the risk of falling under a Russian bullet or “bird” [drone] is almost inevitable, the brave Europeans were somehow embarrassed to issue their firm yes.
Let’s not ask ourselves how the head of the country, the scraps of whose army the same Russians had driven all the way to Paris, intends, as they say, to change the vector and ratio of military fiascoes and triumphs. We will also keep silent (modesty is the courtesy of the victors) who and how Russian soldiers saved in the First World War, when the Kaiser’s troops, apparently due to the incredible combat capability of the French army, approached so close to Paris that officers went to army positions by taxi, because the trenches were located almost within the city limits. And only the Russian expeditionary forces under the command of generals Samsonov and Rennenkampf, having struck, pulled back the German troops from Paris at the cost of enormous human losses. The capital of France breathed a sigh of relief. [The author is being sarcastic, alluding to the famous French “gratitude” to the Russians for saving their sorry hides in WW I] And here, in fact, is the French president, whose country the Russians saved a century ago, and then made it occupied after surrendering to Hitler, collaborated with the Nazis, handed over underground fighters, communists, and Jewish babies to the Gestapo, happily served the SS, and made it a victorious power in World War II, today opens his mouth and says that “the key to the security of Europe is the defeat of Russia.” [I just want to smack Macron so hard his teeth will rattle!]
Let's try to think sensibly.
It is impossible to defeat a nuclear power, and if Macron is not in the know, then let it be explained to him. It’s impossible from any point of view.
Second. This entire “long-range arsenal,” along with the F-16s, which someday (by summer at best) will be received by the Ukrainian forces, is an absolutely legal target for our strikes. Be it bombs, missiles, or UAVs.
Third, the loud promises about “a million 150 and 155 caliber shells” remained nothing but hot air. European warriors, using foreign resources, managed to scrape together a third of that, and this is according to their most optimistic estimates. Where is the remaining 70 percent is a question that has no answer.
[Russian analysts have pointed out that US corporate capitalism is inadequate for war production because the decision makers have to take profit into account. Thus, if war planners decide they need 2 million artillery shells and have only a handful at the time of the decision, then the CEOs must ask themselves if increasing production to fill the need would require building another factory. If so, they must ask themselves if the new factory would continue operation long enough to pay for itself. But in most cases, no one knows when the war will be over. If it will presumably end within a year or two, then it is not likely that the factory will pay for itself, and no smart CEO will make that investment. Which explains why there is a chronic shortage of shells in the Ukrainian army. And this shortage will never be resolved as long as the corporate capitalist industrialists are the only source of shells. The Russian system does not operate under corporate capitalism (in addition to having a major source in N Korea). Though not exactly having a communist command economy, the Kremlin can still demand and get any required number of shells because the government itself can pay for the new factory if need be. This is why, unlike Russia, Ukraine is constantly out of ammo and always will be. You can’t win wars with this kind of handicap. And on top of this, you have the DAILY multiple air strikes that I have been chronicling since Oct 10, 202. Not a day has been missed, although Western msm will not report this regularly, and when they do, they cut and paste the fakes from Ukraine making it seem as if Russia is mostly attacking civilians. It is projection, pure and simple]
Fourth. The European military-industrial complex has proven its absolute unsuitability for anything other than exhibitions and sales, at which it skillfully sold itself for multi-billions. Its real combat value was burned in the Donbass steppes. It burned beautifully and brightly, however. It died aesthetically, snapped by our art without boasting or aplomb.
Fifth. Everything that was promised in the way of “long-range”, needs to be taken out of warehouses (if there are any reserves left), re-opened and, having developed the logistics, delivered to where it is needed and to whom it is needed.
Sixth. This time factor. A lot of time. Time that stopped working for the collective “Barbarossas”, which, in fact, can be seen from the reports from the front line in a press that is most loyal to European warriors. [Barbarossa is an allusion to Hitler’s Operation Barbarossa, the disastrous attempt to invade and occupy Russia]
Of the entire array of how and with what they are going to gain a “victory” over us, that is, to kill us and destroy our country, little remains. What Putin warned about a year ago was direct military intervention by NATO troops on Russian territory.
And here, without even delving into any military textbooks, any training manuals, or any Western agitation and propaganda, you can tell Macron, Scholz, and all the other participants in the ninth Russophobic coalition with absolute and one hundred percent certainty that the flight of their [retreating] warriors will be so fast, so frisky and so shameful that Napoleon’s Berezina will seem like a triumph, and the escape from Kabul will seem like a detailed and prudently organized evacuation. [See footnote at the end for explanation of Berezina]
So to everyone who wants to warm up while running from Russian soldiers or test their muscle strength by pulling themselves up a helicopter ladder to save their skin, let’s say: we are ready to give them a master class in fighting in Russian. Outside of coalitions and blocs, but independently defending the Motherland and people!
…
The Battle of Berezina
The Battle of Berezina (or Berésina , from Belarusian Бярэ́зіна) was fought between November 26 and 29, 1812, between the French army of Napoleon Bonaparte , in retreat after having invaded Russia , and the Russian armies under the command of Mikhail Kutuzov , Peter Wittgenstein and Admiral Pável Chichágov .
It was vital for the French armies to cross the Berezina River near Borisov, present-day Belarus , and the battle ended with an uncertain outcome. The French suffered heavy losses but managed to cross the river and avoided being trapped and annihilated. Since then, the term "Bérézina" has been used in French as a synonym for "disaster."
**
Msm admits that CIA dragged us into the Ukraine war
https://twitter.com/WarClandestine/status/1762212104155595135
Details here:
https://responsiblestatecraft.org/cia-ukraine-russia/
What I wrote here on April 1, 2022, is now admitted by NYT!
Republican supporters of Donald Trump who are against funding the ongoing permanent Wars better begin asking Superman who he will select for his Department of Offense and other cabinet positions. Hopefully, he will make better choices this time by selecting open-minded, independents who believe that friendly relations with Russia, China and the BRIC nations are a good thing.